![]() ![]() While there are several tools on the market, I chose WCopyfind because it is a single executable program that can be installed and run on a local PC. As such it can be used to securely perform analysis of files that exist on a local hard drive. Many of the plagiarism detection tools are Cloud-based and require data to either be uploaded to a third party site for analysis or require that a SAS tool have access to files on a local hard drive. Because of the confidential issues involved as an expert witness, I require a program that will not risk the proprietary software of either company. WCopyfind - One of the primary tools I have found to be useful is the Open Source software WCopyfind. WCopyfind is a Windows-based plagiarism program that compares documents and reports similarities in words and phrases. ![]() In the final analysis you will have to look at two pieces of code side by side, but the following tools will help narrow down where to start looking. Once you have evidence of identical software, take a close look at the two sections of code. It's easy to get tangled up with it hours will be wasted trying to make it right.This is the second of a three part article on Software Piracy and contains practical tips for locating and identifying misappropriated software. This part will give a programmer, or someone familiar with software syntax, a running start if faced with the task of trying to identify copied software. I wouldn't recommend SVN for the novice, though. I've entertained the idea of using SVN (source control), but haven't yet had to go to that extreme. ![]() It can get very confusing, very fast if you don't keep some sort of record. I track the release in a spreadsheet, mostly so I know which retailers have which version. All of these files go into a separate folder. A "release" consists of the word doc, a pdf (for my web site, Scribd, etc.), an ePub (for B&N), the cover png (for CreateSpace), and the CreateSpace version. This sounds like what you're trying to get away from, but it works for me.Ģ.) When releasing in eBook format, I version each "release" with a version similar to a software product (I'm a software engineer by day). That way, I have a new copy each day and can fairly easily go back to a previous version on a day-by-day basis. I've got a couple of things I've done or tried over the years:ġ.) When starting my edits or writing for the day, I make a copy of the word doc using the date in the filename. One very key problem is junk getting uploaded, I suggest if you're going to use this as a collaborative system you make sure to set some very clear rules, as seeing unnecessary junk files in the repositories is infuriating. This is particularly true when it comes to the command line tools, but GUIs fair no better. It goes with out saying, people tend to find it hard to explain (and the ones I've had to were from a technical background no less). if it's not too clear, with out Internet, or any server. I personally recommend something like git for the simple reason that unlike subversion you can work completely locally anywhere, anytime ie. Similarly you could coordinate work with other people responsible for certain aspects of how your writing is suppose to look, proof reading, editing, and so forth, and all this with out going though a iterative time consuming "pass me the last copy" process. You could for example have a proof read copy and do a diff to check what the person changed. The advantages go beyond single user use. This is usually outside the realm of the source version control, and usually in the webview. ![]() Depending on where you host and what you use, you could also have comments at certain lines (all the way to the extent of discussions). You can also create branches, merge branches, and so on. In a version control system you can perform such things as diffs to basically get a view showing changes from one version to another. It isn't really easy to organise because of it. Usually what I do is to save multiple copies with incremental numbers, but I find that this isn't a good method because I end up with a folder full of word documents of the same file + changes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |